<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call to Action: Obama’s &#8220;U.N. Tax&#8221; Proposal, S.2433, Up for Senate Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/</link>
	<description>The Five Boxes of Liberty: the Soapbox, the Mailbox, the Ballot Box, the Jury Box, the Ammunition Box. Use in that order.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriot</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I understand that there are differing views, and I realize what they all are. You, however, seem to have missed the entire point of this website, as well as this post.

It all boils down to this: S.2433 is a threat to liberty. Period. That is why the post was made to begin with, and if you can&#039;t understand that, then you have no idea the perilous times we are living in, nor can you comprehend the fact that politicians &lt;strong&gt;regardless of party&lt;/strong&gt; are stealing our liberties to advance their own political agendas.

Abraham Lincoln once said that the government shouldn&#039;t tear one man&#039;s house down to build another man a smaller house. Think about that for a minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that there are differing views, and I realize what they all are. You, however, seem to have missed the entire point of this website, as well as this post.</p>
<p>It all boils down to this: S.2433 is a threat to liberty. Period. That is why the post was made to begin with, and if you can&#8217;t understand that, then you have no idea the perilous times we are living in, nor can you comprehend the fact that politicians <strong>regardless of party</strong> are stealing our liberties to advance their own political agendas.</p>
<p>Abraham Lincoln once said that the government shouldn&#8217;t tear one man&#8217;s house down to build another man a smaller house. Think about that for a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t helping around the world (i.e. ridding Iraq&#039;s dictator) the selling point that hushed the criticism for Iraq? 

Isn&#039;t there pressure to do more around the world to help AIDS countries? 

Doesn&#039;t the US spend incredible amount on middle east peace initiatives and economic incentive? 

Like I said, you must come to grips with the fact that you have a different view than  others in the country in which you share.

My challenge to you is twofold. I not only challenge you to  realize that there are competing views which contrast to yours in this country, but also figure out what those views are. 

Based on what you wrote above, I garanteee you will find your views alone don&#039;t sum up America.

Obama is courting a specific constituent, and not you

American in not a homogeneous or monolithic place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t helping around the world (i.e. ridding Iraq&#8217;s dictator) the selling point that hushed the criticism for Iraq? </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t there pressure to do more around the world to help AIDS countries? </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the US spend incredible amount on middle east peace initiatives and economic incentive? </p>
<p>Like I said, you must come to grips with the fact that you have a different view than  others in the country in which you share.</p>
<p>My challenge to you is twofold. I not only challenge you to  realize that there are competing views which contrast to yours in this country, but also figure out what those views are. </p>
<p>Based on what you wrote above, I garanteee you will find your views alone don&#8217;t sum up America.</p>
<p>Obama is courting a specific constituent, and not you</p>
<p>American in not a homogeneous or monolithic place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriot</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Name one person that feels charitable on April 15th.

Americans (and people in general) are more likely to give when they&#039;re taxed less. And direct giving to charitable organizations (or -- gasp! -- people themselves) has a lower overhead in &quot;administrative fees&quot; that you&#039;ll see with ANY government operation, let alone the UN. If the corrupt oil-for-food program taught us anything, it&#039;s that the UN is a cesspool of corruption.

Now if you want to give money to the UN, then you go ahead and write them a check. But no one should be FORCED to give. 

And I assume you are okay with disarming US citizens of their guns, putting US citizens on trial in front of an international court, and throwing our parental rights away? Does our sovereignty mean nothing to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name one person that feels charitable on April 15th.</p>
<p>Americans (and people in general) are more likely to give when they&#8217;re taxed less. And direct giving to charitable organizations (or &#8212; gasp! &#8212; people themselves) has a lower overhead in &#8220;administrative fees&#8221; that you&#8217;ll see with ANY government operation, let alone the UN. If the corrupt oil-for-food program taught us anything, it&#8217;s that the UN is a cesspool of corruption.</p>
<p>Now if you want to give money to the UN, then you go ahead and write them a check. But no one should be FORCED to give. </p>
<p>And I assume you are okay with disarming US citizens of their guns, putting US citizens on trial in front of an international court, and throwing our parental rights away? Does our sovereignty mean nothing to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/2008/02/19/call-to-action-obama%e2%80%99s-un-tax-proposal-s2433-up-for-senate-vote/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re totally oblivious that many Americans are indeed charitable, and might just applaud Obama&#039;s efforts. I think the foregoing possibly escaped your premise for this reasoning. Americans don&#039;t want to see other places in poverty.

Now, there is a difference between spending money for a senseless cause - a war where lives are lost, and spending money for a worthwhile cost, where lives are saved.

I think you just don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re totally oblivious that many Americans are indeed charitable, and might just applaud Obama&#8217;s efforts. I think the foregoing possibly escaped your premise for this reasoning. Americans don&#8217;t want to see other places in poverty.</p>
<p>Now, there is a difference between spending money for a senseless cause &#8211; a war where lives are lost, and spending money for a worthwhile cost, where lives are saved.</p>
<p>I think you just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

