<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama: Wrong choice as Commander in Chief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/</link>
	<description>The Five Boxes of Liberty: the Soapbox, the Mailbox, the Ballot Box, the Jury Box, the Ammunition Box. Use in that order.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reader 7-31-2010, News &#38; Commentary - The Five Boxes of Liberty</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-67548</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reader 7-31-2010, News &#38; Commentary - The Five Boxes of Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/?p=166#comment-67548</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s the new form of diplomacy of the Obama administration. Let&#8217;s talk with our enemies. For example, they want a &#8220;change of mindset&#8221; in Afghanistan and want to open up talks with the Taliban. Obama also wants a &#8220;New Start&#8221; treaty with Russia and wants to cut our nuclear stockpile by 30-40%. And that worked out sooooo well in the past, hasn&#8217;t it? Despite Desert Storm, George H.W. Bush was another talker who was responsible for the first START treaty with the USSR in 1991. And how did our enemy respond to talking? They never adhered to the 1991 START treaty, violating it from day 1 till the end. As we said two years ago: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s the new form of diplomacy of the Obama administration. Let&#8217;s talk with our enemies. For example, they want a &#8220;change of mindset&#8221; in Afghanistan and want to open up talks with the Taliban. Obama also wants a &#8220;New Start&#8221; treaty with Russia and wants to cut our nuclear stockpile by 30-40%. And that worked out sooooo well in the past, hasn&#8217;t it? Despite Desert Storm, George H.W. Bush was another talker who was responsible for the first START treaty with the USSR in 1991. And how did our enemy respond to talking? They never adhered to the 1991 START treaty, violating it from day 1 till the end. As we said two years ago: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And the Congressional Medal of Wimpiness Under Fire is awarded to&#8230; - The Five Boxes of Liberty</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-67535</link>
		<dc:creator>And the Congressional Medal of Wimpiness Under Fire is awarded to&#8230; - The Five Boxes of Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/?p=166#comment-67535</guid>
		<description>[...] the U.S. military is Obama&#8217;s objective, isn&#8217;t it? Why yes, it is. And as FiveBoxes reported int he past, it&#8217;s always [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the U.S. military is Obama&#8217;s objective, isn&#8217;t it? Why yes, it is. And as FiveBoxes reported int he past, it&#8217;s always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reader 4-17-2010, News &#38; Commentary - The Five Boxes of Liberty</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-67533</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reader 4-17-2010, News &#38; Commentary - The Five Boxes of Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/?p=166#comment-67533</guid>
		<description>[...] 52% of Americans who voted for Obama, the people we call &#8220;fiddytwoers&#8221;: We told you so. We warned you that Obama was the wrong choice as commander in chief. We warned you that he would weaken this nation. But you bought his self-aggrandizing ad campaign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 52% of Americans who voted for Obama, the people we call &#8220;fiddytwoers&#8221;: We told you so. We warned you that Obama was the wrong choice as commander in chief. We warned you that he would weaken this nation. But you bought his self-aggrandizing ad campaign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fast_rope71</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>fast_rope71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/?p=166#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Well said sir. Succinct, and not without a sense of urgency.

Interesting tomes indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said sir. Succinct, and not without a sense of urgency.</p>
<p>Interesting tomes indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .45 user</title>
		<link>http://fiveboxes.com/more.php/2008/07/11/barack-obama-wrong-choice-as-commander-in-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>.45 user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fiveboxes.com/?p=166#comment-233</guid>
		<description>You overlooked one thing: &quot;banning fissile material&quot; means eliminating new nuclear power plants.

This is the _only_ alternative to fossil fuels (which he&#039;s keen to eliminate) that can actually replace fossil fuels in the quantity needed to support our economy (and our military).

This is nothing short of economic suicide, along with military suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You overlooked one thing: &#8220;banning fissile material&#8221; means eliminating new nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>This is the _only_ alternative to fossil fuels (which he&#8217;s keen to eliminate) that can actually replace fossil fuels in the quantity needed to support our economy (and our military).</p>
<p>This is nothing short of economic suicide, along with military suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

